The ensuing colorful days are well known. Justice BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court. Hoynes, Jr., New York City, for other respondents. Porter, Washington, D.C., for respondent Bowie K. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Removal of the resultant inconsistency at this late date is a matter for legislative, not judicial, resolution. 64 (1953), is an established aberration, in the light of the Court's holding that other interstate professional sports are not similarly exempt, but one in which Congress has acquiesced, and that is entitled to the benefit of stare decisis. Held: The longstanding exemption of professional baseball from the antitrust laws, Federal Baseball Club v. The District Court rendered judgment in favor of respondents, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Petitioner, a professional baseball player 'traded' to another club without his previous knowledge or consent, brought this antitrust suit after being refused the right to make his own contract with another major league team, which is not permitted under the reserve system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |